A Finnish way for the Japanese educational system?
Ditulis oleh S Agung Wibowo di/pada Mei 8, 2008
Jepang memang bangsa pembelajar. Tetapi harus dibedakan antara pendidik dan birokrat. Dan itu juga terjadi di mana-mana
Agung Wibowo
Diunduh tanggal 8 Mei 2008 jam 9.53 WIB
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/fl20080506a2.html
Tuesday, May 6, 2008
A Finnish way for the Japanese educational system?
By TOMOKO OTAKE
Staff writer
Ever since students in Finland emerged as top performers in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), many teachers and policymakers in Japan have turned to this Scandinavian country of 5.2 million for insights on how to educate children.
Symposiums and seminars on Finnish education abound. Experts say that Finland’s schools are flooded with requests for tours from abroad. At the Marunouchi head store of Tokyo-based bookseller chain Maruzen, books touting “Finland education methods” have been selling well since the end of 2005, when the first in a series of practical guides to Finnish education was published, says store employee Yoshitaka Kudo.
Started in 2000 and held every three years since, the PISA survey measures 15-year-olds’ abilities in reading, math and science, and is unique in that it tests how students apply the skills and knowledge they learn in school to real-life situations, rather than testing their skills or knowledge per se.
Finland ranked No.1 in the PISA’s 2006 survey in the area of science, followed by Hong Kong and Canada. In the same survey, Japan came in 6th, followed by South Korea’s 11th, the U.K.’s 14th and the United States’ 29th.
What’s so special about Finland? Japanese parliament member Marutei Tsurunen, a naturalized Japanese citizen who was born in Finland, told reporters at a recent lecture in Tokyo that in Finland teachers help children learn on their own, rather than giving or teaching them answers. Finnish kids get virtually no homework, even on weekends, and their summer break is 2 months long, he said. Coupled with such a relaxed style of learning is a sense passed down from parents to children over generations that the Finnish must learn on their own and communicate well with others to survive, given the nation’s weather and a history of being invaded by its neighbor Russia.
Seiji Fukuta, a professor of comparative culture studies at Tsuru University in Yamanashi Prefecture who has written numerous books on Finnish education, pointed out several factors that make the Scandinavian country’s education stand out. First, the purpose of education there is to nurture character and instill a sense of independence among individuals, whereas in Japan, many students study to achieve high scores in exams and thus entrance into high-ranking high schools and universities. Second, Finnish teachers, all of whom must have a masters’ degree in education, enjoy relative freedom on what and how to teach. Third, Finland gives no tests to students until the age of 16, which means they are driven not by competition but their own desire to learn.
“Students’ motivation to learn will not last long if they are studying just to compete,” Fukuta says. “If they are studying just to pass the exams, they forget what they learn the minute the tests are over.” Fukuta expressed skepticism over the recent publication of Japanese-language books claiming to teach “Finnish methods,” saying that they are not authentic. Methods of logical and analytical thinking in such textbooks are not unique to Finland, he said.
What can people learn from the Finnish system? Walt Gardner, a retired public-school teacher from California who occasionally contributes essays on education to the media, says Americans have always believed in pragmatism, whereas Finland “considers education for its value per se.”
“I think the lesson that schools in the United States can learn from Finland is that testing shouldn’t be used punitively but constructively,” he says. “Assessment is an indispensable part of the educational process. But it should be used to help teachers improve their instruction.”
With the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 in the United States, the results of mandatory standardized tests are posted, and “naming and shaming are thought to be the best way to shape up schools,” says Gardner.
There is no sign that Japan as a whole will adopt the Finnish approaches any time soon. In fact, the Education Ministry in February released drafts of a new course of study at elementary and middle schools that should become effective in 2011 and 2012. For the first time in 30 years, schools are increasing the number of class hours and teaching content and reducing the number of hours to teach “integrated study classes” a course in which schools decide what to teach, and which resembles the integrated, experience-based way many Finnish teachers teach such subjects as physics, geography and mathematics.
“Finnish education is future-oriented in that it fosters students’ ability to keep learning,” Fukuta says. “The question is whether we too can nurture a lifelong habit of learning
Tomoko Otake)
Frans berkata
Apa mungkin ya di Indonesia bisa terjadi demikian?
Sedari kecil kita sudah di beri doktrin (langsung atau tidak langsung) mulai dari orang tua, guru, yang lebih tua….dst bahwa kita jangan begini, jangan begitu, awas…., kamu harus lakukan ini, harus begitu, yang orientasinya lebih sering hanya merujuk kepada pengalaman mereka (orang tua, guru dll) saja.
Merujuk kepada itu maka “DESIRE TO LEARN”nya kurang.
Tentu saja hal ini menyebabkan seperti katak dibawah tempurung. (No expression, no creativity, less experience, and the worst thing become stop questioning).
Memang di daerah Scandinavia sana jauh sekali berbeda.
Denmark contohnya; Dinegara ini fasilitas sekolah dari TK sampai Perguruan Tinggi semuanya GRATIS TOTAL, demikian juga dengan fasilitas kesehatan juga Gratis.
Dinegara ini perkuliahan tidak ada batasan waktu berapa tahun target harus lulus, yang penting si Mahasiswa yang menentukan masa depannya. Pemerintah (Eduactional Department-nya) lebih kearah “fasilitator” yang serius tingkat kepeduliannya.
Namun memang untuk mencapai ini ada yang harus dikorbankan. PAJAK dari semua kalangan (RAKYAT) DIKUTIP 50% dari PENDAPATANnya. Bayangkan apa ini mungkin di negara kita?
(NPWP aja tidak ada; Apa Kata Dunia………a….a!!!)
Keberhasilan ini membuat penduduk DENMARK dijuluki sebagai orang yang paling BAHAGIA. (Walau mereka tidak merasa seperti itu”
Banyak sekali opini yang saya dengar yang logikanya akan sangat baik untuk kemajuan pendidikan kita (saya juga setuju), namun kondisi ini masih seperti situasi sebelum tahun 1928-an..sebelum kongres Pemuda, adanya kelompok2 (cluster-cluster) pengembang pola pendidikan yang jitu dan manjur tapi bergerak sendiri-sendiri aja.
Pemerintah tahu khog, lalu mengambil peran untuk pura-pura tidak tahu, (Kalo diubah dikit…?,wah bisa repot deh, program rutin kedinasan bisa molor, ntar waktu LPJ kena batunya, He3x)
Walau pendapat ini seperti menunjukkan adanya sedikit rasa kecewa, namun harus kita akhiri dengan ekspektasi yang positif.
Semua Indah Pada Waktunya….
Salam
Frans
agung1971 berkata
Paling tidak tulisan ini membuat kita punya contoh nyata dalam kehidupan ini.
Yang ideal itu tidak selalu diawang-awang.
Agung W